Crown Prosecution Service is Institutionally Anti-White, Says New Study

The Crown Prosecution Service is institutionally anti-white, lies about the true nature of racial crime in Britain, and is overtly politically biased, according to a new study of that body.
“The CPS uses deeply flawed analysis to hide the fact that a hugely disproportionate number of victims of racist crime are white,” said Mr Tony Shell of DarkLake Synectics, an independent, non-political research organisation, which produced the report.
“THE CPS also attempts to falsely characterise racist crime as an activity committed exclusively by white people, and has abandoned colour blind law enforcement in favour procedures to the disadvantage of the white community,” Mr Shell said.
The report, entitled ‘The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) and Racialist Policy,’ makes an incisive analysis of the racial attitudes of that body by using its own published papers and commentary.
“The CPS’s own papers give an insight into its perception of racism within society, and allow us to look for evidence of institutional racism within the CPS itself,” Mr Shell continued.
According the CPS’s own documentation, racist crime in the UK is ‘typically’ a crime perpetuated by a white person on an ethnic minority victim.
“There is persistent reference to institutional racism as being characteristically a problem of persecution only for the ethnic minorities (i.e. non-white) population,” Mr Shell said.
“There is a danger that this may give a misleading impression of the nature of racism within the UK, and needlessly encourage a feeling of victimisation within minority groups.”
Mr Shell points out that no account appears to have been taken with regard to the demographic distribution of UK ethnic groups. “For example, when factored in to the crime survey figures from the CPS, the Police, the Home Office and the British Crime Survey, the perception of racism as being ‘typically’ a crime committed by white people is shown to be bogus.
“Given the population demographics for the first set of results for the period 1995/1996, the actual reported figures show the white community actually experiencing levels of racist crime some 100 times greater than should be expected (compared to the other, minority ethnic communities.)
“Similarly, given the population demographics for the second set of results for the period 2002/2003, the actual reported figures show the white community actually experiencing levels of racist crime some 36 times greater than should be expected (compared to the other, minority ethnic communities).
“This is a situation not reported by the authorities (the Home Office and the CRE). Indeed the manner in which they present the ‘evidence’ tends to give exactly the opposite impression.”
Mr Shell said even more recent analysis of BCS crime data for 2004-2005 showed that the white community experienced levels of racist violence some 72 times greater than should be expected, compared to other ethnic communities.
“In terms of interracial murder, both in terms of suspects and convicted offenders, it is the white community that suffers most from interracial murder — more white people are murdered by members of the ethnic minority community than vice-versa.
“This is despite there being approximately ten times more white people than there are people from the minority (BME) communities. Therefore a consistent picture is emerging in terms of the victims of this category of murder — proportionately speaking, the white community experiences approximately 30 times more victims of interracial murder than should be expected, when compared to that experienced by the ethnic minority communities.”
“A similar pattern of behaviour emerges when we analyse the criminal data relating to racist murder. Over the last nine years more white people have been victims of racist murder than people from the ethnic minorities.
“On a proportionate basis, the white community experiences approximately 60 to 90 times more victims of racist murder than should be expected, when compared to that experienced by the ethnic minority communities.
Mr Shell also reveals in his report that the CPS has adopted the
Macpherson definition of ‘institutional racism’, to the exclusion of all other alternatives. This is, he said, a non-evidential, and therefore a conveniently unchallengeable definition, based on psycho-sociological ideology.
In addition, Mr Shell continued, the CPS shows an “arrogant dismissal of all contrary views and analysis. No justification or reasoning given other than characterising contrary arguments (of researchers, workers within the legal and law enforcement professions) as ‘indicative of institutional racism.’”
The shocking document, which should be required reading for all those seeking an understanding of the mindset which has helped to create the anti-white establishment under which we live, can be downloaded here. Highly recommended!