Monday, December 8, 2008


“I have no comment about black males in the media, except that according to holy scripture (along with all those not in the media and their female counterparts), none of them should be living north of Cairo or west of the Azores. Africa, not England, is the land of Ham, the pro-genitor of the black race, Psalm 105:23, 27, 106:22, Genesis 10:6-20 (The Table of Nations - note that Hamites later located in the land of Canaan were out of bounds, which is why they had to be expelled by the Children of Israel under the leadership of Joshua, Joshua 1-24).”


“Sinn Fein actually support illegal immigrants! Eastern Europeans, particularly Poles, are the same religion as Sinn Fein/IRA. Poland is 96% Catholic and Lithuania is 69% Catholic - these were the two European nations mentioned in the BT article. This kind of immigration can only help the Sinn Fein/IRA cause, which is a united Ireland under the Pope. The EU's aim is that mainland Britain should suffer the same fate - and the Mozzies are also a means to that end. Mozzie aggression is a means of driving the British population back into the 'fold,' as the Pope will be perceived as the only leader of any substance willing to stand up to them. He never really apologised for his anti-Mozzie remarks, only regretted that he had been 'misunderstood.'”

“The IRA and the Nazis all belonged to the same [Catholic] church. Their blood-brotherhood in terror (along with Islam and the ANC) should surprise no-one”.

Islam is a Vatican creation”. “Both Catholicism and Islam have a common objective - the destruction of Protestant Britain”Further, on the blog of BNP newspaper editor Martin Wingfield, Alan O’Reilly asserts that “all the world's religions, including Islam, are gradually merging to worship the Catholic BVM. This is not good news for England's identity, any more than the armada of 1588 was”.

“the real enemy, which is the same one Britain has always had since Henry VIII broke with Rome in the 16th century. It's just a question of straegy and tactics to suit the times, as in 1588 (Armada), 1642 (Civil War), Stewart Pretenders (1715, 1745), Napoleon (1815), Kaiser Wilhelm II (1914), Adolf (1939-40). All the tyrants alluded to belonged to the same church as Sharia Blair, with the exception of the Kaiser and he was a sympathiser, allied to Catholic Austria-Hungary. Adams and McGuinness have been described as "two fine f****** Catholic boys" by IRA heavy Brian Keenan, who masterminded the Libya-IRA connection, i.e. Mozzies and Papists colluding to murder British security personnel”.

“Rome's premier target was the 1611 Authorised King James Bible .. he main attack was orchestrated by Romish Anglican Cambridge academics .. They produced the Revised Version of 1881, a Catholic bible that was the forerunner of all the modern bibles that have effectively marginalised the national church”.

“Unfortunately, the [Coronation] Oath was tampered with in 1910, to remove the clause whereby the monarch is supposed to disavow the Catholic mass, in accordance with Article 31 of the Church of England’s 39 Articles of Religion .. which is one reason, I believe, why Britain became embroiled in WW1 a mere 4 years after the Oath was corrupted. God is not mocked”

“If you want to know who set up WW1, 2, for example, read ‘The Vatican Against Europe’ and’ The Secret History of the Jesuits’ by Edmond Paris, a French writer who was murdered by Jesuits for his publications against them”.

“It was even a Jesuit, Fr. Staempfle, who 'ghosted' Adolf Hitler in the writing of Mein Kampf. Even Hitler had part-Jewish ancestry, as did other leading Nazis but that did not stop him from instigating the murder of 6,000,000 European Jews. That was because he and all the leading Nazis, plus the commandants of the death camps; Hoess, Koch, Stangl etc. all belonged to the same [Catholic] religion - which was not Judaism.You have no chance of winning any war if you can't identify the enemy [i.e. Catholics]”.

British government to blame

Fate is not without irony so I do actually think that a certain degree of responsibility does lie at the feet of the British government (not the people of Britain) for the situation in Sub-Saharan Africa in general and Zimbabwe in particular.
We were largely instrumental, through men like Peter Hain, in the demise of white rule and the inevitable economic destruction that followed, with Rhodesia the bread basket of Africa becoming Zimbabwe the Basket Case of Africa.
The truly sad part is that the people of Zimbabwe inherited a vibrant and burgeoning economic and infrastructure so little was required in terms of genius to sustain it and keep things ticking over. They have had ample time to prove the ‘benefits’ of majority rule and have abjectly failed. I don’t think it is our problem any longer. They have got what they asked for. Perhaps Peter Hain has some more bright ideas?


The British establishment is to blame for the MARXIST MUGABE being in power! I remember the WHOLE of the Britsh left singing the praises of this MARXIST MONSTER back in the 70s and 80s! Mugabe was even “Educated” by British Christian missionerys. Some one should remind these do gooders of that.Rhodesia was a great properous country back then. Then “Black majority rule” it became Zimbabwe. The basket case of Africa. Just like i predicted it would at the time! The Zimbabweans wanted “The White man out” They got what they wanted, we should leave well alone! Let them solve their OWN problems!
Every political system has been tried in Black Africa? From Capitalism right thru to Marxism? The Black Africans have FAILD AT EVERY SYSTEM? One wonders, given that fact, what contribution the large numbers of Black African now living in Britain (thanks to Nu Labour) are going to make here?

Louis Theroux programme about crime in Johannesburg

Having just watched the Louis Theroux programme about crime in Johannesburg, it gave me a stark reminder of why we need to reclaim our land back. It used to be a lovely city with no crime years ago when a civilised culture ran it. Now it is just an anarchic cess-pit full of evil wicked crime. Even the liberal presenter could not be failed to be shocked by the brutality of the people, you could sense they were hoping to get a “blame the whites” angle, but even the liberal BBC couldn’t find one. Look at that city and London, Birmingham, Manchester etc. are not that far behind. If you just accept mass immigration by third world parasites then you will get what you deserve.
The complete collapse of the Marxist South African state can’t be many years behind Zimbabwe. I give it another five years. Predictions of 10 or 15 years are way too optimistic. In fact with the global recession now taking place meaning less foreign aid from the West, the country could go belly-up at any time.
Crime is endemic in SA but it’s only when you view something like Theroux’s documentary do you actually realise just how corrupt and cheap life there actually is. Gangs in Johannesburg have taken over hundreds of apartment buildings and rent them out to squatters who have no water or electricity. To a black this is running a business enterprise. After all why should whites have property when blacks can steal it from them. I feel sorry for any poor whites still forced to live there. It must be hell on earth. Apartheid may not have been the greatest system in the world but it must have been a hundred times better than what has now replaced it. It was an African solution for an African problem. But I see no light at the end of the tunnel for that benighted continent. It will soon revert to the Stone Age.
Like you I see the same future for the UK if people continue to vote for the insane Lib/Lab/Con political criminals and their policy of mass immigration

Zimbabwe blames Europe for Cholera Outbreak

Cholera — a disease spread primarily by insanitary conditions and easily combated by simple hygiene — has been blamed on Europe by Zimbabwe’s state controlled media.
The outbreak of the disease which has claimed nearly 600 lives, was blamed by Zimbabwe’s Sunday Mail newspaper on “European sanctions.”
“The cholera outbreak is a clear example of the effects of sanctions on innocent people,” it said in its editorial.
“All the victims (of cholera) are as a result of the freezing of balance of payments support, depriving the country of foreign currency required to buy chemicals to treat our drinking water.”
In reality, however, there are no economic sanctions on Zimbabwe, despite the overtly anti-white and murderous nature of its government (once hailed as a bastion of peace and democracy by the crazed far left) and its version of democracy a la African style. The only sanctions which exist are personal restrictions on top-ranking individuals within the Zimbabwe government.
The EU’s sanctions list contains 168 members of the Zimbabwe regime, including Mugabe and his wife Grace, who are banned from entering EU nations and whose European assets have been frozen.
Ironically, some three years ago Zimbabwe begged Britain for help in dealing with the cholera epidemic. British Prime Minister Gordon Brown responded by promising at least £8 million in assistance, despite the fact that the disease, spread by ingestion of faecal-contaminated food or water, is easily containable by basic hygiene.
“Our central hospitals are literally not working,” David Parirenyatwa, Zimbabwe’s Health Minister said at the time. “Our staff are de-motivated and we need your support to ensure that they start coming to work and our health system is revived.”
Britain currently provides foreign aid to the value of £40 million a year to Zimbabwe.

The Price of Multiculturalism: Words Associated with Christianity and British History Vanish from New Oxford Children’s Dictionary

Words associated with Christianity, the monarchy and British history have been dropped from the latest version of Oxford University Press’s Junior Dictionary for Children to reflect ‘multiculturalism.’
Oxford University Press has removed words like ‘aisle’, ‘bishop’, ‘chapel’, ‘empire’ and ‘monarch’ from its Junior Dictionary. Dozens of words related to the countryside have also been culled.
Indian-origin Vineeta Gupta, who is head of children’s dictionaries at Oxford University Press, said: “We are limited by how big the dictionary can be. We are also much more multicultural. Our understanding of religion is within multiculturalism, which is why some words such as ‘Pentecost’ would have been in 20 years ago but not now.”
“The changes have been made to reflect the fact that Britain is a multicultural and multifaith society.”
Academics and head teachers said that the changes to the 10,000 word Junior Dictionary could mean that children lose touch with Britain’s heritage.
“We have a certain Christian narrative which has given meaning to us over the last 2,000 years. To say it is all relative and replaceable is questionable,” said Professor Alan Smithers, the director of the centre for education and employment at Buckingham University.
An analysis of the word choices made by the dictionary lexicographers has revealed that entries from ‘abbey’ to ‘willow’ have been axed.
Lisa Saunders, a worried mother who has painstakingly compared entries from the junior dictionaries, aimed at children aged seven or over, dating from 1978, 1995, 2000, 2002, 2003 and 2007, said she was “horrified” by the vast number of words that have been removed, most since 2003.
“The Christian faith still has a strong following,” she said. “To eradicate so many words associated with Christianity will have a big effect on the numerous primary schools who use it.”
Ms Saunders realised words were being removed when she was helping her son with his homework and discovered that ‘moss’ and ‘fern’, which were in editions up until 2003, were no longer listed.
“I decide to take a closer look and compare the new version to the other editions,” said the mother of four from Co Down, Northern Ireland. “I was completely horrified by the vast number of words which have been removed.”
Anthony Seldon, the master of Wellington College, a leading private school in Berkshire, said: “I am stunned that words like ‘saint’, ‘buttercup’, ‘heather’ and ‘sycamore’ have all gone and I grieve it.”
Words taken out include carol, cracker, holly, ivy, mistletoe, dwarf, elf, goblin, abbey, aisle, altar, bishop, chapel, christen, disciple, minister, monastery, monk, nun, nunnery, parish, pew, psalm, pulpit, saint, sin, devil, vicar, coronation, duchess, duke, emperor, empire, monarch, decade, adder, ass, beaver, boar, budgerigar, bullock, cheetah, colt, corgi, cygnet, doe, drake, ferret, gerbil, goldfish, guinea pig, hamster, heron, herring, kingfisher, lark, leopard, lobster, magpie, minnow, mussel, newt, otter, ox, oyster, panther, pelican, piglet, plaice, poodle, porcupine, porpoise, raven, spaniel, starling, stoat, stork, terrapin, thrush, weasel and wren.
Words put in include chatroom, tolerant, vandalism, negotiate, interdependent, creep, citizenship, EU, cautionary tale, bilingual, compulsory, democratic and Euro.

Orwellian nightmare

It really is becoming like an Orwellian nightmare now, this is the equivalent of thought crime, and I’m getting really scared for our future.
If you think in a wider context you could easily believe that a number of apparently disconnected policies are being run in parallel to achieve the same objecttive:
Mass imigration, not allowing the flying of the national flag, a single currency, etc to remove any form of individuality or identity.
The dumbing down of education, tv, etc to stop people from thinking & fill their heads with slogans, branding, and sound bites.
The continuous increases on taxation of alcohol & the smoking ban whilst cheap beer is available from the supermarkets to stop people from meeting socially - in case they talk to each other, which might cause them to think.
The passing of idiotic laws to allow the police to be used to achieve political goals (as in this case - in the US they even want to create a homeland security force for Christs sake - a kind of 21st Century paramilitary brown shirts).
The refusal to speak the truth or to allow the reporting of it, and many other disempowering policies.
The only way for this to be stopped is for the majority of the people to stand up & say no - unfortunately most of them can no longer think or understand what is happening, many others just don’t care since it doesn’t effect them directly yet (it only people like the “evil” BNP), and the ones who rely on Labour giving them huge piles of benefits, or are employed in beaurocratic public sector non-jobs will just do whatever they are told so that they don’t lose their income.
I believe that an economic collapse is coming, after which will be a one World (or one Western World) currency (as first proposed openly in 1943), after which will come a one World government, army, & police force, afeter which there really will be a foot stamping on a human face - forever.

Friday, December 5, 2008

Harvard Hates Whites

HOW And WHY WhitesAre Made GUILTY !Is the multicultural campaign really about diversity? Or is it about stamping out Western civilization and the “white race” itself?
College students will tell you that a university education today is a guilt trip for whites. The purpose is to prevent whites from appreciating and absorbing their own culture and to make it difficult for whites to resist the unreasonable demands (quotas, reparations, etc.) from “people of color.”
To the questions, “who am I, what am I,” the white university graduate answers: “a racist, sexist, homophobic oppressor.”
Neither parents, trustees, alumni, nor the public are aware of the anti-white propaganda that masquerades as education. When someone who is aware tells them, they think the person is exaggerating in order to make a point.
Now comes Harvard educated Noel Ignatiev, an academic at Harvard’s W.E.B. DuBois Institute for African-American Research. Dr. Ignatiev is the founder of a journal, Race Traitor, which has as its motto, “treason to whiteness is loyalty to humanity.”
The journal's purpose is 'to abolish the white race.'
At the least, Dr. Ignatiev intends cultural and psychological genocide for whites. It is unclear whether physical extermination is part of the program. A statement by the editors on the web site says that the new abolitionists
“do not limit themselves to socially acceptable means of protest, but reject in advance no means of attaining their goal.”
Dr. Ignatiev does not believe his agenda is controversial. He writes:
“The goal of abolishing the white race is on its face so desirable that some may find it hard to believe that it could incur any opposition other than from committed white supremacists.” Thus does he put whites on notice. If they oppose their abolition, they are “white supremacists.”
According to Dr. Ignatiev,
“The key to solving the social problems of our age is to abolish the white race.”
“Make no mistake about it,” he says,
“we intend to keep bashing the dead white males, and the live ones, and the females too, until the social construct known as ‘the white race’ is destroyed,not ‘deconstructed’ but destroyed.”
What “social construct” will be left? A black one? An Hispanic one? Muslim? Asian? What about Jewish?
The Washington Times reports that Dr. Ignatiev is himself Jewish. If Jewish intellectuals and Israeli political leaders can be believed, Jews have a cultural and racial consciousness. Israel is the Jewish homeland, and Israelis seem determined to keep it that way. Can anyone imagine a gentile at an Israeli university founding a magazine devoted to abolishing the Jewish race?
Yet, Dr. Ignatiev believes that it is self-evident that whites in their homelands should be abolished.
Where did he get this view? His only education was at Harvard where he received two graduate degrees.
Is Harvard embarrassed? No. Dr. Ignatiev [] is showcased in the current issue of Harvard Magazine. Getting rid of whiteness is not controversial at Harvard, because it is the business of American universities.
A white skin, you see, is a mark of privilege. It is not the privilege of being admitted to Harvard even though you don’t meet the entrance requirements. It is not the privilege of being hired independently of ability because of government enforced racial quotas. It is not the privilege of being able to sue whites and “white companies” if blacks are not proportionately represented in the work force. It is not the privilege of being able to call whites every name in the book and sue if a white replies in kind.
The privilege of being white is that whites can secretly believe they are superior and, as long as they don’t mention it, be loyal to the white race.
“The white race is like a private club,” says Dr. Ignatiev.
I am sure Dr. Ignatiev is well-informed, but I see no signs of this white loyalty. Most of the multiculturalists and radical feminists are white. Whites disadvantaged whites by imposing racial quotas. Despite widespread opposition to quotas, neither “white” political party will act to stop unconstitutional quotas, which have made a mockery of equality under law. Whites are inundated by massive non-white immigration, and neither “white” political party will act to restrain immigration. To the contrary, both parties pander to the immigrants.
But Dr. Ignatiev has an idea like Hitler. A race is guilty and must go. The communists said it was a guilty class that had to go.
If you thought genocide was left behind in the 20th century, be apprised that today genocide has a home in the educational system.

Charlton Heston

Actor Charlton Heston, born October 4, 1924, was one of some performing artists who received the Kennedy Center honors on December 6, 1997. Mr. Heston remained in Washington D.C. and addressed the 20th Anniversary of the Free Congress Foundation and the 4th Birthday of the NET TV network. The following are excerpts from his Insightful remarks. Mr. Heston and Mrs. Heston celebrated 50 years of marriage in 1994.
A cultural war is raging across our land-storming our values, assaulting our freedoms, killing our self-confidence in who we are and what we believe. (Mr. Heston then asked those present who owned a gun to raise their hand.)
I wonder how many of you own guns but chose not to raise your hand? How many of you considered revealing your conviction about a constitutional right, but then though better of it?
If so, you are a victim of the culture war being waged against traditional American freedom of beliefs and ideas. You have been assaulted and robbed of the courage of your convictions. Your pride in who you are and what you believe in has been ridiculed, ransacked, and plundered! It may be a war without a bullet or bloodshed, but with just as much liberty lost: You and your country are less free!
Because you choose to own guns- affirmed by no less than the Bill of Rights- you embrace a view at odds with the cultural war lords. If that is the outcome of cultural war, and you are the victims, I can only ask the obvious question. What will become of the right itself? Or other rights not deemed acceptable by the thought police? What other truth in your heart will you disavow with your hand?
Rank-and-file Americans wake up every morning, increasingly bewildered and confused at why their views make them lesser citizens. The message gets through; Heaven help the God fearing, law-abiding, Caucasian, middle- class Protestant-or even worse, evangelical Christian, Midwestern or Southern- or even worse, rural, apparently straight-or even worse, admitted heterosexuals, gun-owning or even worse, NRA-card-carrying, average working stiff-or even worse, male working stiff-because, not only don't you count, you are a down-right obstacle to social progress. Your voice deserves a lower decibel level, your opinion is less enlightened, your media access is insignificant, and frankly, mister, you need to wake up, wise up, and learn a little something from your new-America and until you do, would you mind shutting up?
That is why you didn't raise your hand. That's how cultural war works. That's what happens when a generation of media, educators, entertainers, and politicians-led by a willing President-decide the America they were born into isn't good enough anymore. So, they contrive to change it through cultural warfare of class distinction! Ask the Romans if powerful nations have ever fallen as a result of cultural division. There are ruins around the world that were once the smug centers of small-minded, arrogant elitism. It appears that, rather than evaporate in the flash of a split atom, we may succumb to a divided culture!
The Constitution was handed down to guide us by a bunch of wise old dead white guys who invented our country! Now some flinch when I say that. Why! Its true-they were white guys! So were most of the guys that died in Lincoln's name opposing slavery in the 1860's. So why should I be ashamed of white guys? Why is "Hispanic Pride" or "Black Pride" a good thing, while "White Pride" conjures shaven heads and white hoods? Why was the Million Man March on Washington celebrated by many as progress, while the Promise Keepers March on Washington was greeted with suspicion and ridicule? I'll tell you why, Cultural warfare!
You don't see other Hollywood luminaries speaking out on this do you? Its not because there aren't any. Its because they can't afford the heat! They dare not speak for fear of CNN or the IRS or the SAG or NBC! It saps the strength of our country when the personal price is simply too high to stand for what you believe in. Today, speaking with the courage of your convictions can be costly, the price of principal can be so high that legislators won't lead and citizens can't follow, and so there is no arm to fight back. That's cultural warfare!
Mainstream America is counting on you to "draw your sword" and fight for them. These people have precious little time and resources to battle misguided Cinderella attitudes, the fringe propaganda of the homosexual coalition, the feminists who preach that it is a divine duty for woman to hate men, blacks who raise a militant fist with one hand while they seek preference with the other, New Age apologists for juvenile crime who see roving gangs as a means to only the merchandising violence as a form of entertainment for impressionable minds, and gun bans as a means to only the Lord-knows-what. We have reached that point in time when our social policy originates on Oprah.
Its time to pull the plug!

Crown Prosecution Service is Institutionally Anti-White, Says New Study

The Crown Prosecution Service is institutionally anti-white, lies about the true nature of racial crime in Britain, and is overtly politically biased, according to a new study of that body.
“The CPS uses deeply flawed analysis to hide the fact that a hugely disproportionate number of victims of racist crime are white,” said Mr Tony Shell of DarkLake Synectics, an independent, non-political research organisation, which produced the report.
“THE CPS also attempts to falsely characterise racist crime as an activity committed exclusively by white people, and has abandoned colour blind law enforcement in favour procedures to the disadvantage of the white community,” Mr Shell said.
The report, entitled ‘The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) and Racialist Policy,’ makes an incisive analysis of the racial attitudes of that body by using its own published papers and commentary.
“The CPS’s own papers give an insight into its perception of racism within society, and allow us to look for evidence of institutional racism within the CPS itself,” Mr Shell continued.
According the CPS’s own documentation, racist crime in the UK is ‘typically’ a crime perpetuated by a white person on an ethnic minority victim.
“There is persistent reference to institutional racism as being characteristically a problem of persecution only for the ethnic minorities (i.e. non-white) population,” Mr Shell said.
“There is a danger that this may give a misleading impression of the nature of racism within the UK, and needlessly encourage a feeling of victimisation within minority groups.”
Mr Shell points out that no account appears to have been taken with regard to the demographic distribution of UK ethnic groups. “For example, when factored in to the crime survey figures from the CPS, the Police, the Home Office and the British Crime Survey, the perception of racism as being ‘typically’ a crime committed by white people is shown to be bogus.
“Given the population demographics for the first set of results for the period 1995/1996, the actual reported figures show the white community actually experiencing levels of racist crime some 100 times greater than should be expected (compared to the other, minority ethnic communities.)
“Similarly, given the population demographics for the second set of results for the period 2002/2003, the actual reported figures show the white community actually experiencing levels of racist crime some 36 times greater than should be expected (compared to the other, minority ethnic communities).
“This is a situation not reported by the authorities (the Home Office and the CRE). Indeed the manner in which they present the ‘evidence’ tends to give exactly the opposite impression.”
Mr Shell said even more recent analysis of BCS crime data for 2004-2005 showed that the white community experienced levels of racist violence some 72 times greater than should be expected, compared to other ethnic communities.
“In terms of interracial murder, both in terms of suspects and convicted offenders, it is the white community that suffers most from interracial murder — more white people are murdered by members of the ethnic minority community than vice-versa.
“This is despite there being approximately ten times more white people than there are people from the minority (BME) communities. Therefore a consistent picture is emerging in terms of the victims of this category of murder — proportionately speaking, the white community experiences approximately 30 times more victims of interracial murder than should be expected, when compared to that experienced by the ethnic minority communities.”
“A similar pattern of behaviour emerges when we analyse the criminal data relating to racist murder. Over the last nine years more white people have been victims of racist murder than people from the ethnic minorities.
“On a proportionate basis, the white community experiences approximately 60 to 90 times more victims of racist murder than should be expected, when compared to that experienced by the ethnic minority communities.
Mr Shell also reveals in his report that the CPS has adopted the
Macpherson definition of ‘institutional racism’, to the exclusion of all other alternatives. This is, he said, a non-evidential, and therefore a conveniently unchallengeable definition, based on psycho-sociological ideology.
In addition, Mr Shell continued, the CPS shows an “arrogant dismissal of all contrary views and analysis. No justification or reasoning given other than characterising contrary arguments (of researchers, workers within the legal and law enforcement professions) as ‘indicative of institutional racism.’”
The shocking document, which should be required reading for all those seeking an understanding of the mindset which has helped to create the anti-white establishment under which we live, can be downloaded here. Highly recommended!

Brainwashing of white British children

Last night on Sky1, I watched 2 episodes of Futurerama. I won’t go in to detail at length, but suffice to say the program makers used that 60 minute prime time slot to instil upon the viewer the following connotations.
(1.). Being slightly overweight makes you a loser in the female attraction stakes.
(2). Holding hands and petting with others of the same sex is just so normal.
(3). Only black people are intelligent enough to understand base 8 maths.
Then we have Hollyoaks - a C4 program that exists just to promote 30 minutes of intense - casual interracial sex. Any breakups in these temporary relationships are always the fault of the white actors.
I see that similar plots are hatched on other programs including East Enders, Coronation Street. Emmerdale Farm, etc…
Even the adverts that run between the above programs suggest that the ethnicity – makeup of Britain has now reached 50% - which it clearly has not!
The propaganda that is upon us is intense. Personally, I think the British should sell their TV’s to whoever wants them, and put all of the money raised along with the savings of not having to fund the BBC’s mandatory license fee towards a brick built White History Centre/museum where they can take their children and reverse the brainwashing that’s being done to them.

24hr alcohol and binge drinking

This is why they introduced 24hr alcohol and encouraged binge drinking - so scum like the Daily Mail could photograph drunken women and say “look at the white trash”This why they destroyed British industries and communities - so they could say “look at the lazy whites”It’s why they sexualise children and abort the future generation - so they can say “look at the teeny white sluts” - and the religion-of peace do look, and then drug, rape and pimp them while the authorities cover it up.This is their common pupose. A slow, tortuous genocide of the white indigenous peoples whose ancient, ancestral homeland this is.They are perverts and vermin who hate this land and people because they hate themselves. They are anti-nature, anti-truth and anti-human.

Karen Matthews

There is an hour long Panorama programme about the Karen Matthews case. This is interesting and distinctive no doubt but hardly justifies the full treatment with the economy falling off a cliff and “our” so called Parliamentarians exposing themselves to yet more public ridicule and contempt for their sorry supine surrender to the Broon jackbook.
Why the full on treatment for Karen Matthews? Simple, it’s yet another attempt to portray our English working class people as scum, well past their sell date and due for replacement by “enriching” cultres. It is smear by association, look at the dysfunctional Matthews lot - aren’t all the white proles the same? Typical BBC propaganda and about as subtle as a smack in the face with a wet haddock, easy to decode from a nationalist perspective, how it plays generally is less clear.
Now Sharon Matthews is no doubt entirely unprepossessing, but what factors contributed to her dysfunctional, choatic life-style and descent into represensible criminality? Here I think we can identify the deindustrialisation wihich tore the guts out of our industrial communities - we have economic liberalism to thank for that. Then there is the social liberalism which deconstructed the traditional morality - the policeman was portrayed as a fascist, the vicar as a hopeless obscurantist, the headmaster as a petty tyrant and bully. The combination of these factors was toxic and the social glue was simply dissolved, nobody talked cohesion when it actually existed in spades.
It may be objected that the majority do not succumb, they just keep going on, doing their best for family and friends in trying circumstances. Perfectly true, but then not every smoker gets ill from the habit - many will though. It’s just a fact that if enough stress is put on then famillies and people will break down; worst of all it gets transmitted to the kids.
It’s one of life’s little ironies that the earmarked replacements for our people come from a harsh, authoritarian culture which keeps girls and women in line by killing them in extremis, should they be deemed to have trangressed far enough from community “morality”. In other words liberals have, by their constant sickening kow towing, bought into a system of social control vastly more harsh than that which they previously sought to dismantle.
Liberals no doubt despise Karen Matthews; but they are worse by far; fools, traitors, quislings, unnatural perverted creatures, self loathers, nation destroying scum

'White Girl'

The BBC Metropolitan elite hate and despise the Northern English working class. Their attitude (like Jack Straw and Harridan Harm-men) is that of the Party Members to the Proles in Orwell’s 1984.
‘White Girl’ illustrated this attitude to the extent that the programme virtually became a parody of itself. It was a crude exercise in Da’wa, Dhimmitude and Taqiyya. It started with the inevitable ‘It’s grim oop north’ opening cliche and then went steadily, tediously and predictably downhill for the next 90 minutes.
The Northern English were portrayed as squalid, drunken, junk-food eating, smoking, gambling, child-abusing, sex-mad, illiterate, intolerant, wife-beating, drug-dealing chavs - whereas the Muslims were simply wonderful.
The examination of the Death-Cult was minimal, with superficial references to Mohammed flying to Jerusalem and the 99 names of Allah.
A particulalrly naff scene was where the white girl ‘exorcised’ her vicious stepdad by repeatedly reciting the shahadah: “Ashadu an la ilaha illa-llah wa ashadu anna muhammadan rasulu-llah” - “I testify that there is no god worthy of worship but Allah, and I testify that Muhammad is the messenger of Allah.”… Presumably this is based on the belief that you can get rid on one child-abuser by invoking the name of an even more depraved one.
There was also the totally erroneous statement that a woman can divorce her husband by repeating “I divorce you” three times. In fact it only works when the husband says it.
The take-home message was that the Northern English working class are a bunch of debased, degenerate scumbags and Islam is the only answer to their problems.
There’s a review of this licence-jizya funded propaganda exercise at

Thursday, December 4, 2008


Egalatrianism has destroyed Britain, and much of the West. The idea that all are equal, and can be made equal, is false. Men and women and not equal, all races are not equal-some races have better abilities than others, some have greater physcial abilties, some are more intellegent and some can govern countries better. Cleary Africans ave better physical abilties than Europeans, but are far less able to run countries. There has never been a successful African civilisation. That may be blasphemy to black power activists and whites, who are full of 'white guit' but it is the plain truth. Africa is not poor, due to Africa, or due to 'whitey,' or due to Africans. Africa has more natural resourses-coal, oil, gold etc. than any other part of the world-but its the basket-case of the world. In fact, blacks did not know of the wheel or of the spade, before the white man arrivied on the African continent. Cannibalism and child sacrifise was commonplace, just as it is now, since the white man left Africa. It is not that whites took the resources from whites, it is that blacks did not know how to extract the resources from the ground. Even now with white technology in Africa, blacks are able to extract the resources, but are unable to use them to make their countries better. Under white rule, recouses were extracted, sold, and at least some money wa sused to improve their countries, and some went back to Britain. Blacks hd education health and housing, which, even though was now of the same standard of the white man, were better than no education, health and housing like it is now under Black rule. This is why Africans will carry on flooding into Britian, this is why Africans will kill themselves trying to reach Britain, to live under 'whitey'-the same folks they threw about of Africa 50 years ago . They want the education, health and hosuing that white rule provides, and black rule cannot provide. Its nothing to do with white exploiting black countries- its all to do with the fact that blacks. Only return of white rule in Africa will stop immigration to Britian from Africa. Uncontrolled immigration to Britain will turn Britian into Africa, and will become just another third world hellhole. Its is the White Anglo Saxon Celtic Protestant people of these shores that made Britain, along with US, Australia, South Africa and New Zealand great-no one else.

Wednesday, December 3, 2008

Iran accuses Hollywood of 'psychological warfare'

Hollywood is already firmly established as a source of cultural decadence in Iran's pantheon of hated western symbols.But now the country's Islamic leadership has accused it of "psychological warfare" over its depiction of the battle between the Greeks and Persians at Thermopylae in 480BC, regarded as a key event in the birth of western democracy by some historians.President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad's government has joined MPs, bloggers and local media in denouncing the newly-released Warner Brothers epic, 300, as a calculated attempt to demonise Iran at a time of intensifying US pressure over the country's nuclear programme.Mr Ahmadinejad's spokesman branded the film "an insult to Iran" while four MPs have urged the foreign ministry to pressure other Muslim countries to ban it.The film, directed by Zack Snyder and based on a novel by Frank Miller, grossed nearly £40m in ticket sales in three days after opening in north American cinemas last week. It portrays the heroic endeavours of 300 Spartans, under King Leonidas, who are shown resisting an invading force of 120,000 Persian troops led by Emperor Xerxes.The plot depicts the tiny Spartan force repeatedly outmanoeuvring the invaders and being defeated after a three-day stand-off only through treachery. Iranians complain that it represents them as savage, murderous and warmongering.The film's availability in Iran has been limited so far to pirate DVDs, but that has not stopped an outpouring of official condemnation.The government spokesman, Gholamhossein Elham, described the film as "cultural intrusion" and an attack on Iran's ancient civilisation. "Such a fabrication of culture and insult to people is not acceptable by any nation or government," he told reporters. "[Iran] considers it as hostile behaviour which is the result of cultural and psychological warfare."The reformist newspaper, Ayandehno, accused the makers of trying to set international opinion against Iran to fit President George Bush's description of the country as belonging to an "axis of evil"."In the film Iranians are considered to be monsters devoid of any culture, humanity and wisdom who know nothing except attacking other lands, threatening peace and killing human beings. There is no option other than to confront, fight and destroy this wicked tribe so that the world can be saved from this axis of evil," the paper's film critic wrote.It is not the first Hollywood production to cause upset in Iran. There was widespread anger over the favourable portrayal of Alexander the Great in the 2004 film, Alexander. The Macedonian king is reviled in Iranian culture for destroying the seat of Persian imperial greatness at Persepolis after defeating Emperor Darius III in 330BC.

Is the Pope a Catholic?

On New Years Day 2004 former Pope John Paul II called for a "new world order... based on the goals of the United Nations."
When a world leader uses this terminology, it can only mean one thing. He is apart of the Luciferian conspiracy to create a totalitarian world government.
According to Piers Compton, a former Catholic priest, the Papacy was actually subverted by the Illuminati in 1958 when John XXIII became Pope. This was the culmination of a 200-year campaign to infiltrate and destroy the Catholic Church.
Piers Compton was the Literary Editor of the Catholic Weekly The Universe for 14 years. He documents his claims in The Broken Cross, (1981) a book that is almost impossible to find because it was mysteriously withdrawn a few weeks after its release. It is now available online.
Compton traces the modern phase of the Luciferian Conspiracy to Adam Weishaupt who established the Illuminati on May 1, 1776.
"[Weishhaupt] was backed financially, as are most if not all anarchistic leaders, by a group of bankers under the House of Rothschild. It was under their direction that the long range and worldwide plans of the Illuminati were drawn up." (8)
In 1783, the Illuminati assumed control of much of Freemasonry, which secretly coordinated the revolutionary movement (Liberalism, Socialism, and Communism.) According to David Bay, "secret societies like the "Skull and Bones" have always functioned as Satan's church, as the only way to pass the baton from generation to generation."
The Illuminati regarded the Catholic Church as their chief enemy and marked it for ruin. In 1818, their Italian lodge issued a set of Permanent Instructions that included: "We require a Pope for march more securely to the storming of the church...." The goal was "the complete annihilation of the Catholicism and even ultimately of Christianity. If Christianity were to revive, even upon the ruins of Rome, it would, a little later revive and live." (13-14)
In an Encyclical Dec. 8, 1892 Pope Leo XIII identified two Kingdoms. "The one is the kingdom of God on earth, namely, the true Church of Jesus Christ; and those who desire from their heart to be united with it...The other is the kingdom of Satan...those who refuse to obey the divine and eternal law, and who have many aims of their own in contempt of God, and many aims also against God."
Throughout history they have been in conflict.
"At this period, however, the partisans of evil seems to be combining together, and to be struggling with united vehemence, led on or assisted by that strongly organized and widespread association called the Freemasons. No longer making any secret of their purposes, they are now boldly rising up against God Himself."
Ironically, when Leo XIII died in 1903, a Freemason, Cardinal Mariano Rampolla, was almost elected Pope. Emperor Franz Joseph of Austria vetoed his appointment in the last moment. .
The Illuminists had to wait another 55 years to gain control of the Papacy. When Pope Pius XII died in 1958, a Freemason Cardinal Angello Roncalli, became Pope John XXIII.
Predictably, his first act was to begin to remove the element of Divine Revelation from Catholic teaching, and to embrace naturalism, materialism and Communism. These steps were taken at the Ecumenical Council in 1962 and Vatican Two in 1965.
As a result, Malachi Martin, a former Jesuit, predicted the Roman Catholic Church would no longer be recognizable by the year 2000. "There will be no centralized control, no uniformity in teaching, no universality in practice and worship, prayer, sacrifice and priesthood." (63)
Cardinal Giovanni Montini, who succeeded John XXIII as Pope Paul VI in 1963, was also a Freemason and socialist. (In 1944 Pope Pius XII had dismissed him as Vatican Secretary of State for conducting secret negotiations with the Communists. 53)
Paul VI revealed his true colors in a speech to the United Nations in 1965: "It is your task here to proclaim the basic rights and duties of Man. You are the interpreters of all that is permanent in human wisdom; we could almost say of its sacred character." (67)
This repudiation of the church's spiritual authority was symbolized by Paul's gift of the Papal Ring and his Pectoral Cross to Secretary General U Thant who sold them at an auction. (71)
The United Nations was set up on land donated by the Rockefellers as a front for the elite's Luciferian dictatorship. Its Charter was based on the Constitution of Soviet Russia and its leaders were Communists. It's Chapel is dedicated to paganism and run by the Lucis Trust (formerly Lucifer Trust) which also handles all its publications.
Paul VI also embraced a sinister symbol used by Satanists in the Sixth Century, which had been revived by Vatican Two.
This was a bent or broken cross on which was displayed a repulsive and distorted figure of Christ. Black magicians and sorcerers in the Middle Ages had used it for occult purposes. It represented the "Mark of the Beast."
Compton:" Yet not only Paul VI but also his successors the two John Pauls carried that object and held it up to be revered by crowds who had not the slightest idea that it stood for the anti Christ." (72)
Paul VI abolished the anti-Modernist Oath, the Index of forbidden books, and revised the Canon Laws. History and texts written from a predominantly Catholic point of view were re-edited. He encouraged "humanist" theologians like Edward Schillebeeckx who taught that the "the most honest and natural man was one who believed nothing." (105)
In 1976, the Journal Borghese printed a list of 125 top clerics who were Freemasons in contravention of Church law. It included their dates of initiation and secret code names taken from the Italian Register of Secret Societies. Compton prints the list, which includes the heads of Vatican radio and press, Catholic education as well as numerous high officials, Cardinals and Archbishops.
Because Paul VI was Pope, nothing came of it. Sounding very much like the Mason he was, Paul said in 1969: "We are about to witness a greater freedom in the life of the Church...fewer obligations and fewer inward prohibitions. Formal disciplines will be reduced...every form of intolerance will be abolished." (104)
This attitude is explained by reports that from 1936-1950, the future Paul VI was part of a Communist espionage network, a part owner in a chain of brothels and financed erotic films. (110)
Alibino Lucano, the Cardinal of Venice became Pope John Paul I on August 26 1978. He was also a "committed Left-winger" but he may have taken issue with the Vatican's financial shenanigans because he was dead a month later. There was no autopsy.
Pope John Paul II, Karol Wojtyla, succeeded him. Wojtyla is the first non-Italian since 1522, and the only Pope from an Iron Curtain country. Compton notes that while the other Polish Cardinal Wyszynski "never yielded an inch" to the Communists, Wojtyla opposed this attitude and collaborated. The Abbe de Nantes exclaimed, "We have a Communist Pope."
During the Conclave at which he was elected, Wojtyla read from a book of Marxist principles. In his first Encyclical, he praised Paul VI for having "revealed the true countenance of the Church" and bringing it in step "with the times." He went so far as to say that opponents of Vatican Two "cannot be considered the faithful." (172)
In a letter Sept 1, 1981 he said, "Christian tradition has never upheld the right of private property as absolute and untouchable." This contradicts numerous Encyclicals which state that private property is "a necessary incentive to human enterprise" and in accordance with divine wisdom and the laws of nature.
Pope Pius XII: "Only private enterprise can provide the head of a family with the healthy freedom it requires to carry out the duties allotted to him by the Creator for the physical, spiritual and religious well being of the family." (174)
Communism (state ownership) is a facade by which the bankers and monopoly capitalists will own everything.
On Nov. 27, 1983 Pope John Paul II issued a Papal Bull that legalized secret society membership for Roman Catholics.
While ostensibly a celibate priest, Compton suggests that Woytyla's behavior resembled a Bohemian artist. He was involved in theatre in Poland and penned a play about prostitution. Compton reproduces pictures of him when he was a Bishop or Cardinal. He is with a woman and child on a beach. The child is climbing on him. They look very much like a family.
In 1960, he published a book "Love and Responsibility" which extolled sexual love and describes both the physiology and psychology of sex. He told an audience of French youth: "Bodily union has always been the strongest language two people can have for each other."
Writing from the vantage point of 1981, Compton predicted that the Church's traditional positions will continue to be watered down.
Around the same time, Malachi Martin said, "The Christian church is decaying, has nothing to say and is on the way out." He added that the other great religions are suffering the same fate and predicted, "A worldwide religion with one structure and institutions," managed by "one great bureaucracy. And out of that will emerge the ultimate disaster."
I present this material because it is consistent with the emerging picture of an organized Satanic Conspiracy to subvert mankind.
Only in this light can we identify the lures of the modern world -- consumerism, the mystification of sexual love, and the social engineering associated with feminism, zionism, gay rights, tolerance, diversity -- as part of a diabolical process of spiritual, mental and physical enslavement.
"Modern" western society appears to be based on this conspiracy against God. Our cultural and political leaders are mostly witting or unwitting accomplices.
Eventually we will learn that real freedom lies in obeying God. The alternative is to become Lucifer's slave. The barbarism of the past century was not an aberration, but a harbinger of the future.

Hetero-phobes Want to "Desegregate" Toilets

The State of Colorado took a giant step toward abolishing gender last week by ordering that toilets and locker rooms be unisex.According to Bill SB 200, passed May 29, business owners and managers of restaurants, gyms, barber shops, massage parlors and managers of public facilities cannot deny a person employment or access to a facility based on gender or "perception" of gender."...The Colorado state legislature and its governor have made it fully legal for men to enter and use women's restrooms and locker-room facilities without notice or explanation.." said James Dobson, founder of Focus on the Family, the Christian publishing and broadcast ministry in Colorado Springs."Henceforth, every woman and little girl will have to fear that a predator, bisexual, cross-dresser or even a homosexual or heterosexual male might walk in and relieve himself in their presence," Dobson said. "Those who would attempt to protect females from this intrusion are subject to a fine of up to $5,000 and up to one year behind bars." Dobson warned the Colorado bill now will be "coming to every state in the country."In Maryland ,citizens are fighting a similar law which allows a male to use the toilet or shower with women merely by insisting he is a transvestite or "a woman inside." The law includes "restaurants, hotels and motels, retail stores, hospitals, swimming pools."Perverse elite social engineers are using the "rights" of a handful of transvestites as an excuse to attack the modesty, dignity and identity of hundreds of millions of heterosexuals who apparently have no human rights.The goal is to erase masculine and feminine distinctions as a step toward abolishing the family and retooling the human race as androgynous worker-consumer serfs. This is the future found in Aldous Huxley's Brave New World. ASSAULTING THE LAST BASTION OF GENDERToilet and locker room are the last bastion of gender distinction and a tempting target for advocates of one-world, one-religion, one-race and now, one-sex. They want to equate gender with race and "desegregate" facilities. Can you hear the melody of "We shall overcome?"The toilet is a a sanctuary where women can attend to their make-up etc. away from the prying eyes of men. It is a pit stop for men. In a civilized society, heterosexual strangers are not physically intimate in public.But some homosexuals are. Bathrooms are a scene of homosexual activity. Again, we are being pressured to behave like homosexuals.Heterosexual attraction requires that men and women maintain their dignity, modesty and mystery. Nothing damages this allure more than listening to each others' sounds and inhaling each others' fumes. Civilization is predicated on asserting man's spiritual nature and ideals over his physical lusts and functions. Modern society has been subverted by occultists and perverts who affirm man's physical nature while denying his soul altogether. Increasingly on TV and in movies, there is a adolescent obsession with bodily functions and sex characteristic of arrested development. The Luciferian assumption is that outraging and destroying civilized norms equates with being courageous and funny. In "Scary Movie IV" a beautiful blind woman, dressed in a sexy corset, defecates at a public meeting, in a parody of "The Village." In Seinfeld, women are portrayed not sharing toilet paper in a bathroom. In "Ally McBeal" there was a unisex bathroom. This is a hateful assault on femininity and heterosexual norms. It is disconcerting when someone I respect like Michael Rivero doesn't get it. He interpreted Dobson's remarks cited above as "male-bashing." (Hardly.) He said unisex bathrooms in Italy were "a very pleasant social environment." (Not how I want to meet women.) He implied that segregated locker rooms and showers promote homosexuality. (If you are already gay.) It's about time we considered the big picture. Ninety six percent of the population is heterosexual and does not want to share public toilets and showers with the opposite sex. With the promotion of the homosexual "lifestyle alternative" , gay marriage, feminism, porn and promiscuity, heterosexuals are under siege and don't even know it.OCCULT ATTACKThe pretend-concern about homosexual or transsexual rights is nothing but a pretext to extend this attack on gender. If this toilet nonsense doesn't convince you we are under occult assault from elite social engineers, nothing will. As I wrote before:"God's Creative Force enters humanity through a man's love for his wife and desire to raise his family in a secure and wholesome environment. It is reciprocated by a woman receiving her husband's seed (which symbolizes his spirit) and nurturing it. We get our values, identity meaning and love from family. Thus, the Cabalist central bankers are keen to neutralize the male-female (active-passive) dynamo by making women usurp the male role. The bankers want to destroy family and ultimately assume the initiating male or "God" role themselves.According to the book, "Light bearers of Darkness" the Jewish Cabala is a powerful system for gaining control over people by harnessing and perverting sexual energies. (20)In Studies in Occultism, (Quoted in "Lightbearers of Darkness") Henri de Guilbert says the Cabalist Jew "looks upon himself as the sun of humanity, the male, opposed to which other peoples are but the female, manifesting and assuring the coming of the Messianic era. In order to realize this sociological manifestation, the Jew organically extends his influence by means of secret societies, created by him in order to spread everywhere his initiating force...(hoping to realize ) the universal republic controlled by the god of humanity, the Jew of the Cabala." (21)We need to take the example of movements like PAC, Ex-gays and Mass Resistance and angrily oppose this unconscionable social engineering. We need to stand up and be heard--loud and clear.---

The Truth About "Diversity"

We are all affected by "Diversity" but few understand its true nature. Warning: It isn't pretty. "Diversity" is a massive long-term behavior modification program that uses minorities to disinherit the majority. In English, "Diversity" means acknowledging different races, religions and "sexual orientations."
In New World Order Doublespeak, "Diversity" is a devious way to dilute and discriminate against the white, heterosexual Christian majority in Europe, Canada, Australia and the US.
While it pretends to advocate equality, its real goal is to guilt mainly heterosexual White males into yielding position and power. The object is to prepare North America and Europe for inclusion in a "world government" run by the central banking cartel based in London. This private cartel's power is measured by the fact that virtually every major corporation, educational institution and government agency provides "diversity training" (i.e. political indoctrination) to its employees. Even though studies show it has zero economic benefit, they spend eight billion dollars a year on it. Toyota alone plans to spend that much in the next ten years. Here is an example of the shaming of Whites that takes place in these sessions. It is from the text, "Seeing Ourselves: Exploring Race Ethnicity and Culture" (1999) by Carl James. A participant, Greg tells the group: "As for my race, I am white but I never really had to think about it before. I don't feel that it ever affected the people with whom I associated or talked to. My two best friends are Black and (Canadian) Indian. I was brought up in a family that didn't believe in prejudice and I'm proud of that. If I don't like a person, it is because of their personality, not their race or heritage." Now you'd think that Greg would pass with flying colors. You didn't consider the hidden agenda. The author, a Diversity trainer, chastises Greg for assuming he is "the norm." Greg fails to acknowledge his "race privilege," that "invisible package of unearned assets" that is the "white colonial legacy." Whites like Greg deny "the ways in which they socially, culturally and politically produce relations of domination." (p.44)
In other words, Whites naturally oppress other people. That sounds like vicious racism to me.
Can you see what's happening? These Diversity sessions lay guilt trips on Whites, especially males, so they will yield power to compliant & grateful minorities who have not earned it. This is a scam. Anyone who objects to this political agenda commits career suicide. That's political persecution. I want to be clear that I think the human race is one family and God loves all people equally. Like Greg, I believe people should be judged on their merit alone, regardless of race, gender or sexual orientation.
I have no problem with "minorities" winning positions of power so long as they do it fairly. I welcome the rich contribution immigrants make. I came to Canada when I was a baby in 1951.
But "Diversity" is not about fairness or enriching society. It promotes minorities not for their own sake, but as a way to undermine and control the majority. IRONY It's ironic that the central banking clique should lay this guilt trip on Whites when they are responsible for imperialism and wars past and present. They grew even richer through the slave and opium trades, and they control organized crime today through their agents. The US population is more than 75% White and Christian. The plan is for Whites to become a minority by 2050 or sooner. Whites are expected to stand by and become guests in their own house.
When Whites are a minority, no one will champion their rights. There are two million more females than males at US universities. Have you heard of any affirmative action programs for males?
"Diversity" is practically unheard of in China, Japan, Israel, India and Latin America. These countries are allowed to keep their racial character. But because people of European origin have a sense of material, spiritual and political entitlement, they are the hardest to absorb in the New World Order. They are the targets of the "Diversity" program.
The central bankers use the tactic of "divide and conquer" to undermine the four pillars of our identity: race, religion, nation and family. First, they pretended to champion the workers to get rid of the Tsarist regime in Russia. Then they pretended to champion women and homosexuals to undermine heterosexual values and the family. Finally they are duping Whites to passively accept discrimination and diminished status.
They use the same dog-eared playbook. (Select one) Workers, Jews, Blacks, homosexuals, women have been oppressed for centuries. Let the bankers put their (select one) front men (or womyn) in power. CONCLUSION Malleable and conformist, the masses will usually adopt the norm. When evil people set the norm, the masses will succumb to distorted and self-destructive behavior. The banking cartel creates money using our national credit. As a result, society has been subverted by an alien power with a satanic agenda. Our poltical and kultural elites consist of traitors who, for example, allowed 9-11 to take place and covered it up. We are subjected to a constant stream of lies from these sanctimonious self-serving pawns. In a poll taken Oct. 18, 2007, by the Toronto Globe and Mail, 63% answered "No" to the question: "Do you think Canada's multiculturalism policies have been a success?" The sample was roughly 11,000 and Globe readers tend to be liberals.
The founding peoples of the West have a right to maintain their national character and see it flourish. Immigrants expect to integrate, while retaining their heritage. They don't expect to be used to undermine the majority. So, let's not fall into their "divide and conquer" trap by focusing our indignation on minorities. They are manipulated as much as we. Let's focus on the central bankers and their lackeys, in politics, education, business and the media.
I know this goes against the grain for some. Ask yourself where did you get your attitudes. They were dinned into you by the media and education. We are being manipulated and duped and it's time we awoke.
May I remind you: the term "politically correct" originated in the Communist Party of the USSR in the 1920's. It is not a coincidence that the term is part of our lexicon today. The same bankers who controlled the USSR then, secretly control the USA, Canada and Europe today.

Islamic response to the diversity agenda

When I was growing up in Canada I increasingly felt an urge to go out of my way to promote my identity and flaunt it (I'm Palestinian btw). However, as I grew up I realised there was something wrong with the entire culture that encourages minorities to act like ethnic gangsters (even spoiled middle class brats who never lived in an ethnic ghetto) or to encourage them to be ultra-liberal dupes that support crap like affirmative action.
Frankly the politically correct affirmative action culture that has evolved is sickening. The other day my friend was happy to tell me about some place in Scotland or somewhere where they forced the workers not to eat in public during Ramadan out of respect for Muslim workers. I told him that's bullshit man (we're Muslim too). Because first of all, I told him do you think the establishment in the UK, which engages in Imperialist wars and the media establishment which is continously degrading Muslims and creating an irrational fear of all Muslims, sincerely cares about the interests of Muslims or any minority for that matter? I mentioned that this is a deliberate agenda to create ethnic and religious tensions in most western countries (why else, with the so-called Muslim threat, do thousands of Muslims immigrate to Canada every year?).
Besides, as Muslims living in a non-Muslim country, we have to put up with the fact that most people don't follow our customs and traditions - but who cares as long as we can do them ourselves? Frankly, I wouldn't feel comfortable imposing my values on co-workers and I know also that it would piss them off. But on the other hand it is easy to dupe minorities because white people themselves have either been duped into supporting this agenda, or these minorities have experienced the occassional rascist incident (which isn't really a big deal as long as it's not systematic or serious like the old days) making them more receptive to this diversity crap.
I'm sorry to say Henry, most white people I've encountered are complete dupes that lack self-esteem with regards to their culture (maybe cause of the continuous media and education campaign against them). When I was in university, sometimes I'd throw the question to some friends like 'How come it's ok for minorities to make fun of white people and not the other way around.' Most people would stay quiet since the question was kind of innapproriate or they would mumble some crap about it being okay since they are the majority or because of their history (i.e. treatment of black people or natives).
As Muslims we believe that everyone is accountable for his own actions and every one is born sin-free. Therefore, it is wrong to blame the current generation of 'whites' for the actions of their ancestors. One more creepy incident comes to mind. I knew this Palestinian girl once who was born and raised in Canada. A typical ultra-liberal lost soul. Anyways, one day me and my friend on our univeristy campus were pretending to be a gay couple mocking the recently legalised gay marriage in Canada. A coach in the University saw us and said 'so...they're lettin' fags into the University now!'. Man, I felt like shaking his hand for calling me a fag (I was just pretending of course). I thought people like him were extinct. When we told that girl about him she had the gall to say she would have reported him had she been in our place and she would have had him fired! WHAT THE HELL IS THAT SHIT?!?!?! IT SOUNDS LIKE SOME CREEPY AND SURREAL AND FLOWERLY VERSION OF BIG BROTHER'S TOTALITARIAN THOUGHT & SPEECH CONTROLLED STATE!! Fucking dupes. So to conclude, as a minority, I agree with you, enforced diversity is a load of crap.



Many in the West know that Islam is a big threat, but they do not know the biggest threat-Western liberalism. Islam is a symptom of the problem-it is not the probem. It is not the Muslims who promote low white birth rates, rampant abortion, divorse, feminism, multiculatrism or try to propogate white guilt amongst young white kids. In fact, if the West learns some Islamic principles, it may just survice. This is why Islam is growing in the West- its gives people a purpose to life, not the materalist, feminist sodophile culture of modern Britain.